1 00:00:00,810 --> 00:00:06,090 Today, I am delighted to welcome two guests who are going to be discussing with this interpretation. 2 00:00:06,090 --> 00:00:10,290 Question three The reasons for the Athenian defeat in the Peloponnesian War. 3 00:00:10,800 --> 00:00:18,450 So let's meet them. We have from Cardiff University Dr. Maria Fragoulaki, who is the senior lecturer in ancient Greek history, 4 00:00:18,870 --> 00:00:26,160 and from Cambridge University Professor Paul Cartledge, who is the Emeritus A G Leventis Professor of Greek culture. 5 00:00:27,220 --> 00:00:29,590 So let's think about this interpretation. 6 00:00:29,590 --> 00:00:36,760 QUESTION And the key point perhaps to make is we're looking for the reasons for the Athenian defeat in the Peloponnesian War. 7 00:00:37,000 --> 00:00:41,550 So there's not just going to be one reason I suspect we're looking at a range of the. 8 00:00:42,610 --> 00:00:46,600 Okay. Well, let's think, first of all, about the sources for this period. 9 00:00:47,020 --> 00:00:54,070 So, Maria, if I can turn to you, first of all, what are we relying on and what problems do we encounter? 10 00:00:55,260 --> 00:01:00,660 Well, for most of the Peloponnesian War, our main source is Thucydides' history. 11 00:01:01,290 --> 00:01:12,420 But this text breaks off at 411. And then Xenophon, another Athenian historian, takes over in his Ηελεννιka in the first part of the Hellenica 12 00:01:12,690 --> 00:01:18,030 deals with the end of the war from 411 to fall for the final demise of Athens. 13 00:01:18,960 --> 00:01:29,640 In general, the situation becomes a bit messier after 411 also because you see this is a very dominant voice and after 411 we have Xenophon, 14 00:01:29,650 --> 00:01:32,640 we have the later Diodorus in the Augustan period. 15 00:01:32,970 --> 00:01:42,870 We have Plutarch in the Roman period and his Lives, which are very valuable, but also in the earlier sources covering Thucydides' period as well. 16 00:01:43,170 --> 00:01:52,140 We have, for example, Aristotle's Athenian Constitution, which is so valuable for the events around the 411, 410, 400, 17 00:01:52,950 --> 00:02:01,410 the Oligarchy Coup and the Constitution of the 5000 which followed, and then for Persians, personalities such as Cyrus. 18 00:02:02,130 --> 00:02:05,250 We have Ctesias a different sort of author. 19 00:02:05,250 --> 00:02:16,470 A physician in the Court of Xerxes the second who has a different portrait to sketch for for Cyrus Xenophon and his expedition. 20 00:02:17,100 --> 00:02:23,010 So we have multiple sources on this. And perhaps one last point has to be made about comedy. 21 00:02:23,790 --> 00:02:31,410 It is drama, it is fiction, but it is so valuable in relation to some personalities, such as the the warmonger, the cleon. 22 00:02:32,010 --> 00:02:38,070 He has some valuable insights to offer us, especially in relation to initiatives for peace. 23 00:02:39,510 --> 00:02:47,050 Thank you, Maria. That's very helpful indeed. Well, Paul, if I can come across and welcome you and just one other specific point about these sources. 24 00:02:47,070 --> 00:02:54,570 Is it worth remembering that Thucydides himself, although his narrative cuts off in 411, he survived the war. 25 00:02:54,990 --> 00:02:59,970 So he's writing his history and intending to account for the whole war. 26 00:03:00,180 --> 00:03:07,589 But he knows how it ends. And so we have to consider that in terms of how he frames his history completely. 27 00:03:07,590 --> 00:03:08,490 Right, James 28 00:03:09,090 --> 00:03:18,090 The composition question, as it's called, has sometimes dominated interpretation of Thucydides precisely because of this seeming contradiction. 29 00:03:18,090 --> 00:03:25,229 On the one hand, he writes it up seemingly as the war is unfolding, he tells us that he was of an age, 30 00:03:25,230 --> 00:03:34,230 to understand things when the war broke out 432-1, and that you get the feeling that he's kind of an embedded reporter. 31 00:03:34,440 --> 00:03:39,929 But when suddenly he interjects, as we're going to come on to later, 32 00:03:39,930 --> 00:03:48,239 an obituary notice of one of the leading actors in the war, which actually refers to the end of the whole war. 33 00:03:48,240 --> 00:03:52,799 And perhaps we should say there's a little bit of an issue. Is it one war or is it two wars? 34 00:03:52,800 --> 00:03:59,640 At any rate, it's a great long series of fighting interrupted quite substantially, extending over 27 years. 35 00:03:59,760 --> 00:04:07,800 So on the one hand, he is seemingly he wants us to think that he's, as it were, a journalist on the field and he's reporting back. 36 00:04:08,100 --> 00:04:15,120 He's feeling cocky. On the other hand, he's reflecting on the war and its ultimate meaning. 37 00:04:15,130 --> 00:04:21,660 I mean, he's sometimes thought to be more of a political philosopher than he is what you and I would call a historian or, 38 00:04:21,660 --> 00:04:24,210 if you like, an embedded journalistic historian. 39 00:04:24,450 --> 00:04:32,790 So he's a deeply complex figure, and one has to be careful because he wasn't Athenian, a brilliant intellectual Athenian. 40 00:04:33,060 --> 00:04:40,980 But should we be so reliant, as we say? Thirdly, in a way, on just this one dominance, as Maria puts it, figure. 41 00:04:41,460 --> 00:04:47,130 Thank you. That's excellent. Well, I think that leads us very nicely to our chronological survey. 42 00:04:47,280 --> 00:04:51,690 And let's come back to the year 432, just before the war is going to break out. 43 00:04:51,810 --> 00:04:59,070 And we have these series of meetings and speeches going on in Sparta and the Spartan King Archedamus 44 00:04:59,070 --> 00:05:08,400 is very sceptical about going to war and he seems to say that we need three things to be in place for the war to be won, 45 00:05:08,550 --> 00:05:11,520 the Athenian allies need to be in revolt. 46 00:05:11,850 --> 00:05:19,090 The Spartans need to have funds and with those funds they need to be able to build a navy to match the Athenians. 47 00:05:19,100 --> 00:05:23,790 So do we think that Archedamus may have actually said something like that? 48 00:05:24,180 --> 00:05:26,790 And as a second part to that question, Paul, 49 00:05:27,030 --> 00:05:32,940 could you tell us a little bit about what Spartan-Persian relations had been like for the previous decades? 50 00:05:33,450 --> 00:05:41,970 Let me start with the first point about the nature of Thucydides' History, which is a combination of speech and narrative. 51 00:05:42,220 --> 00:05:51,270 And Thucydides is very self-conscious, which is partly because I think of the time in which he lived at a time of great questioning in Athens in particular, 52 00:05:51,570 --> 00:06:01,290 but also because he is writing very consciously in succession to a really great historian, Herodotus, the father of history, as it's called. 53 00:06:01,530 --> 00:06:09,780 And Thucydides narrative picks up just about exactly where Herodotus' narrative ends in 479 or so. 54 00:06:10,260 --> 00:06:19,860 So Thucydides certainly is conscious that of the speech is the evidence for those ones that he himself could not possibly have heard. 55 00:06:20,280 --> 00:06:24,030 There is no, as it were, archive. There's no recording. 56 00:06:24,210 --> 00:06:29,190 But he can go and check what Archedamus actually said to the Spartans. 57 00:06:29,490 --> 00:06:38,670 So what he does is he writes what he thinks Archedamus ought to have said, given the circumstances in which he were speaking. 58 00:06:39,420 --> 00:06:43,860 Now, Archedmaus had been king for a very long time, so very experienced. 59 00:06:44,190 --> 00:06:48,599 It played a key role as one crucial moment in earlier Spartan history, 60 00:06:48,600 --> 00:06:56,070 when the great revolt of the subject population, the Helots, had actually endangered the whole Spartan state. 61 00:06:56,400 --> 00:07:01,770 This is back in the 460s. Archedamus was the key figure in putting that revolt down. 62 00:07:02,610 --> 00:07:13,980 His memory, therefore, stretches back to not long after the previous great conflict, the great war involving lots and lots of Greeks. 63 00:07:14,370 --> 00:07:20,230 In this case, it was when the Persians invaded Greece under Xerxes and fought him. 64 00:07:20,250 --> 00:07:30,930 The Spartans led the resistance on the Greek side, together with the Athenians, and so therefore Sparta, Persia, hostile from the word go. 65 00:07:30,930 --> 00:07:35,910 But this is spoiler alert in the Peloponnesian War. 66 00:07:36,270 --> 00:07:38,970 Those relations are going to be significant in reverse. 67 00:07:40,560 --> 00:07:50,760 So one of the causes I'm anticipating here, one of the causes why the Athenians lost, involves the Persians and the Spartans combining against them. 68 00:07:51,810 --> 00:07:57,090 How could Thucydides possibly know what Arcehdamus wanted to say? 69 00:07:57,720 --> 00:08:04,230 Well, he would have known a little bit because of what Archedamus then did after the war was declared. 70 00:08:04,680 --> 00:08:14,190 Archedamas, being the senior Spartans of the two Kings, was bound to lead the spartan army plus allies of the Army, as indeed he did. 71 00:08:14,580 --> 00:08:22,200 So we're in the spring, summer, four, three one, the year after the speech that we talking about was notionally delivered. 72 00:08:23,280 --> 00:08:32,620 Archedamus was very hesitant. He didn't sort of rush to the walls of Athens, but dilly dallied to such an extent that his people, 73 00:08:32,620 --> 00:08:40,210 people on his side thought he was less than totally committed to actually attacking Athens and bringing it to its knees. 74 00:08:40,600 --> 00:08:46,530 The Spartans generally, it seems being of the view that that was the way to bring the Athenians to their knees. 75 00:08:46,540 --> 00:08:49,840 You attack them in the traditional way, you threaten their crops. 76 00:08:50,230 --> 00:08:54,250 Athenians are going to be starving and then they're going to have to sue for peace. 77 00:08:54,250 --> 00:08:59,770 Well Archedmaus was, as Thucydides says, had a broader vision of the war, 78 00:08:59,770 --> 00:09:07,690 and as James, you correctly said, in a way Thucydides uses as a warning figure, 79 00:09:08,440 --> 00:09:17,880 so the reader Thucydides who of course lived through the war, remember, Thucydides is writing the whole thing after the war has ended. 80 00:09:17,890 --> 00:09:22,090 You know, he's writing at least some of it after the whole war has ended. 81 00:09:22,900 --> 00:09:26,170 They therefore know how the war actually evolved. 82 00:09:26,170 --> 00:09:33,670 And so I think, you know, it does seem to be used by Thucydides as a sort of predictor, if I can put it that way. 83 00:09:34,450 --> 00:09:40,870 Thank you. And then just on the issue of whether there have been longer term relations between the Spartans and the Persians, 84 00:09:42,070 --> 00:09:45,840 so far as we know, no direct contact. 85 00:09:45,850 --> 00:09:55,390 There is a talk in the middle of the fifth century when the Spartans were involved in what's called sometimes the first Peloponnesian War, 86 00:09:55,450 --> 00:10:03,100 a series of conflicts and encounters between Athens and Sparta, but mainly between their respective allies. 87 00:10:03,550 --> 00:10:10,750 And there is mention of a Persian ambassador coming to, as it were, explore the field. 88 00:10:10,750 --> 00:10:18,760 But the point is this, that Athens was at war with Persia from the 470 into at least the forties. 89 00:10:19,030 --> 00:10:24,370 There's thought that Athens made a peace with Persia in the early 440s, 90 00:10:24,370 --> 00:10:31,930 in which case both Sparta and things are technically not at war with Persians after the 440s. 91 00:10:32,200 --> 00:10:38,070 But there's no reason to think the Spartans had any contact direct until now. 92 00:10:38,090 --> 00:10:45,909 This is very interesting. Both Athens and Sparta put out feelers just about the time they're debating whether 93 00:10:45,910 --> 00:10:49,660 or not the Athenians have broken the peace that they'd made with the Spartans. 94 00:10:49,810 --> 00:10:57,370 In other words, whether the Spartans had a casus belli cause for going to war of both Athens and Sparta, 95 00:10:57,370 --> 00:11:03,460 sending ambassadors into the Persian Empire. Well, what they want is money. 96 00:11:03,880 --> 00:11:08,830 And fighting a war, especially at sea, costs a great deal of money. 97 00:11:08,830 --> 00:11:16,900 They also want to know, of course, which side if the Persians are wanting to get involved at all, are they going to give them money too? 98 00:11:16,910 --> 00:11:25,870 So again, that predicts what actually happens in the 410s and in the final phase of the Peloponnesian War. 99 00:11:27,380 --> 00:11:30,940 Well, thank you. Let's loop round to the middle twenties. 100 00:11:31,190 --> 00:11:35,440 We're going to come back to this, I think, in a moment and think about these sources. 101 00:11:35,450 --> 00:11:39,980 So as Paul says, Thucydides 50, which is a prescribed source, 102 00:11:40,280 --> 00:11:48,080 talks about both the Athenians and the Spartans sending ambassadors to Persia to to test the water, as it were. 103 00:11:48,830 --> 00:11:56,780 And we've also got on the syllabus some lines early on in the play, Arcanians by Aristophanes where a Persian embassy arrives back in Athens. 104 00:11:56,780 --> 00:12:04,040 That's lines 6211, 71. And we've got a passage by an Athenian orator called Andocides 105 00:12:04,040 --> 00:12:09,199 In the early fourth century. He refers to a piece of Epilecus. That's Andocides 106 00:12:09,200 --> 00:12:15,640 329 Maria. All of these suggest that there are tunnels going on in the early on in the war. 107 00:12:15,650 --> 00:12:19,670 Both Athens and Sparta want to at least keep the Persians quiet. 108 00:12:19,670 --> 00:12:28,930 Is that right? Yes, indeed. As Paul said, as soon as the war broke out, both sides, Athens and Sparta, sent embassies to the Persians. 109 00:12:29,230 --> 00:12:34,870 So we need to keep in mind that basically these contacts continue throughout the war. 110 00:12:35,050 --> 00:12:43,960 It's just that they they don't always surface in Thucydides history, we get this letter that was intercepted in 450. 111 00:12:43,970 --> 00:12:47,530 in Thucydides it is intercepted by the Athenians. 112 00:12:47,530 --> 00:12:53,200 A letter coming from the king carried by an embassy from the Persian king to the Spartans, 113 00:12:53,200 --> 00:12:58,840 complaining that the king doesn't really understand what it is that the Spartans want from him. 114 00:12:58,870 --> 00:13:02,529 Do they want money? Do they want perhaps territory in Asia? 115 00:13:02,530 --> 00:13:06,130 Minor. What exactly they want? They need to clarify. 116 00:13:06,490 --> 00:13:11,950 And this tells us something about this spartan, wobbly ness. 117 00:13:12,550 --> 00:13:18,400 A Spartan wobble in their policies which would follow them until the end of the war. 118 00:13:19,300 --> 00:13:24,880 We need to be aware that the Spartans are uncertain about what their policy is throughout the Peloponnesian War. 119 00:13:26,460 --> 00:13:30,180 Thank you. Well, look, let's pull it back to the beginning of the war. 120 00:13:30,190 --> 00:13:36,960 And Paul, if I can come across to you. We have Pericles' policy of essentially winning through. 121 00:13:37,230 --> 00:13:39,270 That's the translation of the phrase. 122 00:13:39,600 --> 00:13:47,060 The idea that you sit behind the walls of Athens, you don't engage the Spartans in battle because the Spartans are better on land, 123 00:13:47,070 --> 00:13:51,450 the Athenians are stronger at sea, and you just wear down the Spartans' patience. 124 00:13:51,750 --> 00:13:58,710 So is the first reason that they lost the war that they gave up on that policy and more expansive. 125 00:13:58,980 --> 00:14:02,250 Could they have just won the war by sticking to Pericles? 126 00:14:02,820 --> 00:14:08,000 Let's just be a little clear that there is a debate among the scholars about Thucydides 127 00:14:08,010 --> 00:14:14,430 representations of Pericles in general and Pericles' policy for the war, 128 00:14:14,430 --> 00:14:19,200 his strategy in particular. As you said, Thucydides represents it. 129 00:14:19,210 --> 00:14:26,010 It is a primarily overwhelmingly defence strategy, as you've described it James. 130 00:14:26,010 --> 00:14:37,560 And this is the thing that's not often specified or stressed, perhaps enough important offensive elements, e.g. twice yearly invading by land, 131 00:14:37,800 --> 00:14:43,080 the territory of one of sparta's more important Peloponnesian League allies megara 132 00:14:43,410 --> 00:14:50,340 e.g. sending fleets around the Peloponnese which are big hundreds of ships, 133 00:14:50,340 --> 00:14:54,120 which means thousands of men, which means lots of money. 134 00:14:54,390 --> 00:15:01,560 And one type of source which we have nothing like enough, but we do occasionally get public accounts. 135 00:15:01,770 --> 00:15:05,850 So in other words, how much the Athenians are having to spend on the war? 136 00:15:06,150 --> 00:15:11,910 And one of the things that it's pretty clear to us that Pericles got wildly wrong, 137 00:15:12,150 --> 00:15:18,420 as represented by Thucydides and as we probably think Pericles really wanted to do, 138 00:15:18,600 --> 00:15:20,610 which is how much it was going to cost, 139 00:15:20,850 --> 00:15:29,880 because about six years into the war the Spartans have successfully up to that point and they've been invading and they've been resisting. 140 00:15:30,120 --> 00:15:39,960 and what have you but the Athenians suddenly find they have to treble the amount that they're demanding by way of tribute from their naval allies. 141 00:15:40,260 --> 00:15:45,300 So this is a major internal it must have been a debate and dispute. 142 00:15:45,570 --> 00:15:49,170 And therefore, it's very important that we remember that. 143 00:15:50,400 --> 00:15:57,150 And if I can come in there for students, students will know that is the Thoudippos decree, which is a prescribed source. 144 00:15:57,720 --> 00:16:03,250 Oh, well, that's excellent. So, as you said, this represents one of the major mistakes. 145 00:16:03,270 --> 00:16:06,569 There are several, but as James says, this is one of them. 146 00:16:06,570 --> 00:16:14,190 And you could say this is one of the more important of the several possible reasons that said, it is gives for Athens. 147 00:16:14,190 --> 00:16:23,280 Ultimate failure is to abandon his version of Pericles strategy, namely to get much too aggressive. 148 00:16:23,280 --> 00:16:28,109 And that's just one I'm going to mention, no thing, which is a little bit puzzling in itself, 149 00:16:28,110 --> 00:16:33,930 but fits in with this picture of Athenian politicians after Pericles' death. 150 00:16:34,170 --> 00:16:40,080 Not entirely sticking to the Periclean narrative, and it's an expedition sent to Sicily. 151 00:16:40,410 --> 00:16:45,299 What on earth were the Athenians thinking of? And it's about 426 152 00:16:45,300 --> 00:16:48,690 425. Why were they interested in the West? 153 00:16:48,690 --> 00:16:49,709 We'll come back to that. 154 00:16:49,710 --> 00:17:00,090 But it's just an indication of how they were much more aggressive by sea than you would have predicted from what Pericles says Athens was going to do. 155 00:17:01,910 --> 00:17:11,600 Okay. So I guess the question they are going to try and nail this down, if they had just stuck to Pericles' policy, could they have won the war? 156 00:17:13,640 --> 00:17:18,200 So word Thucydides uses through this is perigignomai 157 00:17:18,200 --> 00:17:25,490 the means to survive, which is very negative, you know, not be killed to still be there. 158 00:17:26,180 --> 00:17:32,930 But a translation has been suggested win through, which captures this ambivalence. 159 00:17:33,290 --> 00:17:40,130 There was a problem because very soon after the war broke out, plague struck Athens. 160 00:17:40,490 --> 00:17:46,820 Very soon after the war broke out by the invasion of Athenian farmland. 161 00:17:47,000 --> 00:17:58,610 Athenian farmers, middle class, as it were, Athenians, hoplites, not poor sailors, got very upset at the thought of just watching their livelihood, 162 00:17:58,610 --> 00:18:07,640 not not just the crop of this year, but their entirety of their life going up in smoke almost under their eyes. 163 00:18:08,000 --> 00:18:14,629 Pericles suddenly became extremely unpopular, therefore there was much more, I think, 164 00:18:14,630 --> 00:18:20,750 risk in Pericles' purely defensive strategy than Thucydides will allow. 165 00:18:21,110 --> 00:18:24,439 Now, on the other hand, the Athenians survived the plague. 166 00:18:24,440 --> 00:18:30,160 They survived the invasions, which did relatively less damage to Athens overall. 167 00:18:30,170 --> 00:18:33,350 They damaged individual Athenians terribly. 168 00:18:33,620 --> 00:18:39,499 And the Athenians, therefore. Well, are we moving on already to the mid four twenties? 169 00:18:39,500 --> 00:18:50,959 They had one particular gain by invading the Spartans own home territory and setting up a camp, a base actually within Sparta's home territory, 170 00:18:50,960 --> 00:18:59,360 and therefore encouraging the defection of Helots, the same Helots whose fathers had revolted the generation before. 171 00:18:59,660 --> 00:19:05,000 They really put the Spartans under the cosh round about 425-424 172 00:19:05,270 --> 00:19:12,709 And that suggests that those Athenians who believed in an aggressive policy were thinking, this is going well. 173 00:19:12,710 --> 00:19:16,580 You know, we're making the Spartans on the back foot, too, for peace. 174 00:19:16,910 --> 00:19:23,600 And then of course, it all went belly up in the north when the Spartans did exactly the same to the Athenians 175 00:19:23,600 --> 00:19:29,630 by hitting the Athenians where their timber came from and to some extent their wheat. 176 00:19:30,050 --> 00:19:36,970 So it was a dingdong. And your question, would they have done better to accept a peace offer in the midst of it? 177 00:19:36,980 --> 00:19:40,040 I think yes, on the one hand, but on the other hand, 178 00:19:40,040 --> 00:19:48,079 it wouldn't have washed with Sparta's allies or with Sparta because the Athenians weren't sufficiently smart and they must the Spartans. 179 00:19:48,080 --> 00:19:52,780 It was still always the chance of doing that. Okay. 180 00:19:52,790 --> 00:19:54,880 Thank you. Well, that's answered that question. 181 00:19:54,890 --> 00:20:03,140 And I was going to ask about the the Spartans see for peace after pillows and the Athenians reject those terms. 182 00:20:03,530 --> 00:20:09,550 And that is potentially another moment that Athens could have taken a winning draw, if you like, 183 00:20:09,560 --> 00:20:14,810 but you feel Paul that the Spartans wouldn't have accepted that or their allies wouldn't have accepted that, 184 00:20:14,810 --> 00:20:17,960 that it leaves things too uncertain politically. 185 00:20:18,170 --> 00:20:21,709 We know what happens and we have the benefit of hindsight. 186 00:20:21,710 --> 00:20:31,040 421, when there was a kind of ding dong on both sides as to what sort of peace and indeed whether peace of any kind 187 00:20:31,040 --> 00:20:39,110 was going to work internationally as opposed to making an alliance specifically between just Sparta and just Athens. 188 00:20:39,380 --> 00:20:45,410 So I think the international situation was much too complicated, even in 4 to 5 to four. 189 00:20:46,250 --> 00:20:50,209 Okay. Well, thank you. Well, that brings us across to Maria. 190 00:20:50,210 --> 00:20:55,310 And let's talk about this peace of Nicias like, yes, however you want to pronounce his name. 191 00:20:55,730 --> 00:21:00,860 And this was signed in 421. And the context here is that in the previous year, in 422, 192 00:21:01,220 --> 00:21:10,700 both Cleon and Brasidas were perhaps the leading antagonists on both sides were killed up in the northern Aegean region in a battle. 193 00:21:11,390 --> 00:21:17,360 And we get more figures in both sides who are looking to create a peace. 194 00:21:17,360 --> 00:21:21,820 So we get this piece of Nicias. Yes, Maria. Why does it fail? 195 00:21:22,100 --> 00:21:25,220 And it couldn't have been a long lasting peace, do you think? 196 00:21:27,210 --> 00:21:31,020 Well, it is dubbed by Thucydides as an insecure truce. 197 00:21:32,020 --> 00:21:34,350 perhaps before going to the specific problems. 198 00:21:34,360 --> 00:21:42,370 We must think of a factor which is a bit overarching of Thucydides' interpretation, which is that of national character. 199 00:21:42,850 --> 00:21:51,550 The Athenians wouldn't be the sort of people who would make truce even when they were defeated, let alone when they were victors. 200 00:21:52,360 --> 00:21:57,150 Now, on the specifics of the truce, there were problems with their allies. 201 00:21:57,160 --> 00:22:01,270 They wouldn't accept the terms the allies of the of the Spartans. 202 00:22:01,720 --> 00:22:07,120 And there was an additional problem that the Spartans had a problem with the Argives within the Peloponnese. 203 00:22:07,570 --> 00:22:16,760 In their 30 year truce with the Argives had expired and they now the Argives did not wish to renew the peace treaty and 204 00:22:16,930 --> 00:22:25,299 which is exactly one of the problems that led to the Spartans taking a kind of unilateral step of ignoring their not ignoring, 205 00:22:25,300 --> 00:22:36,790 but not having their allies on their side. They approached the Athenians for a 50 year alliance, which is apparently a step after the truce. 206 00:22:37,780 --> 00:22:47,770 But certainly the general message is that both sides affected by the impact of their own disasters the Athenians in Amphipolis, 207 00:22:48,100 --> 00:22:54,380 the Spartans in Pylos, they somehow sought opportunities for some luck. 208 00:22:54,430 --> 00:22:59,860 Even the Athenians, who are generally represented throughout, is reluctant to strike a peace. 209 00:23:00,700 --> 00:23:07,860 So they sought some kind of settlement. And we have a preliminary stage a year before where there is a preliminary stage 210 00:23:08,010 --> 00:23:13,210 of a sort of a truce between that both sides explore that we find that in Book 4 211 00:23:14,110 --> 00:23:19,179 Which however, didn't stop the Athenian allies in the north going over to the Spartans, 212 00:23:19,180 --> 00:23:22,860 for example, which is something that led to the Battle of Amphipolis. 213 00:23:23,900 --> 00:23:26,930 So all things considered, it was a very problematic truce. 214 00:23:27,200 --> 00:23:31,510 And for this reason, it didn't last. It meant to last for 50 years, the alliance at least, 215 00:23:31,790 --> 00:23:40,340 and it lasted only for six plus something from 421 until 415 or something like more than six years. 216 00:23:41,250 --> 00:23:48,479 Okay. Thank you. Yeah, we've got two peaces really going on. We've got the peace of Nicias which is supposed to involve the allies of both sides. 217 00:23:48,480 --> 00:23:53,220 And then we've got this independent 50 year peace signed between Athens and Sparta. 218 00:23:53,670 --> 00:23:56,910 Can you just tell us a little bit more about these Peloponnesian allies? 219 00:23:57,450 --> 00:24:02,230 I think there's about three or four of them who specifically say we want nothing to do with the peace in Athens. 220 00:24:02,240 --> 00:24:05,790 So I think Corinth is one. Why don't they like this peace? 221 00:24:07,240 --> 00:24:12,549 Yeah. The period between the signing of peace and the swearing of peace, 222 00:24:12,550 --> 00:24:18,670 and then the alliance and the battle of Mantinaea in 418 B.C. is one of the most 223 00:24:18,670 --> 00:24:24,640 confused and confusing in diplomatic terms of all ancient Greek classical history. 224 00:24:24,910 --> 00:24:27,610 And Thucydides doesn't help us. He does his best. 225 00:24:27,970 --> 00:24:38,440 But the shifting alliances within each side, the shifting of ground between as well as within the two sides, is exceptionally complex. 226 00:24:38,710 --> 00:24:44,140 On the spot inside, two particular allies, Mantinaea and Elis, 227 00:24:44,380 --> 00:24:54,580 have grouses with the Spartans added to Corinth and Corinth historically within the what we call the Peloponnesian League. 228 00:24:54,580 --> 00:24:59,920 It's a modern term. It had been in existence in some form since the end of the sixth century. 229 00:25:00,070 --> 00:25:05,590 Corinth had always been number two to Sparta because of its geopolitical position on the 230 00:25:05,590 --> 00:25:11,829 Isthmus and because it had the biggest fleet of any of Sparta's Peloponnesian League allies. 231 00:25:11,830 --> 00:25:20,560 And so in a war that's amphibious, in a war that involves conflict between the Peloponnese and central Greece, Corinth is literally pivotal. 232 00:25:20,680 --> 00:25:28,930 And so they actually at one point secede during this period and they get a kind of mini anti Spartan alliance going. 233 00:25:29,200 --> 00:25:36,160 And if I may move to the other side, the Athenians very cleverly, in a way, exploit this. 234 00:25:36,340 --> 00:25:45,100 Thucydides 235 00:25:45,310 --> 00:25:52,090 whom the Athenians couldn't quite make their mind up about collectively, individually, 236 00:25:52,090 --> 00:25:57,820 namely, Alcibiades comes to the fore and his family and his name, indeed a spot. 237 00:25:58,000 --> 00:26:00,250 He's originally Spartan origin, 238 00:26:00,510 --> 00:26:13,510 and he has a certain sense that he wishes to historically play a key role in relations between Sparta and Athens at this point, between 421-418. 239 00:26:13,510 --> 00:26:21,159 He senses that Argos, which as Maria says, has just come out of a treaty relationship with Sparta, 240 00:26:21,160 --> 00:26:30,610 which ever since the seventh century had hated Sparta because it wanted to be number one in the Peloponnese, not Sparta. 241 00:26:30,850 --> 00:26:37,620 And which now this is a fact we've not yet mentioned shifted between oligarchy and democracy. 242 00:26:37,620 --> 00:26:44,290 Thucydides is very aware that the internal struggle between Democrats and oligarchs quite often 243 00:26:44,290 --> 00:26:50,590 played out on the international stage as between the Spartan Alliance and the Athenian alliance. 244 00:26:50,890 --> 00:27:02,410 So one view is that the Athenians were under Alcibiades' leadership, intervening directly in the politics of the northeastern Peloponnese stirring. 245 00:27:03,190 --> 00:27:04,870 And actually that worked quite well. 246 00:27:04,870 --> 00:27:14,979 The only problem was, of course, that it broke formally the Treaty of Alliance, not so much the peace of Nicias, but the one between Spartan and Athens. 247 00:27:14,980 --> 00:27:23,260 So that we have to leave it, I think, until, if I may go on, just to mention the conclusion of this phase is the battle of Mantinaea. 248 00:27:24,100 --> 00:27:28,030 So was there a possibility there for for the Athenians to really get in behind 249 00:27:28,030 --> 00:27:32,859 Alcibiades' plan and create some sorts of Argive and anti Spartan 250 00:27:32,860 --> 00:27:36,790 Alliance in the Peloponnese and have crushed Sparans like that did they if 251 00:27:36,790 --> 00:27:40,189 they'd gone very offensive there could they have completely won the war that way, 252 00:27:40,190 --> 00:27:48,249 do you think? No. Again, I don't think there was any way short of a Helot revolt, sort of. 253 00:27:48,250 --> 00:27:53,500 Absolutely. As the Thebans did in 370-369 254 00:27:53,500 --> 00:27:58,120 I'm looking well ahead here. Invading Sparta's home territory. 255 00:27:58,270 --> 00:28:05,409 You don't beat the Spartans just by playing around in the northern Peloponnese or indeed at sea, 256 00:28:05,410 --> 00:28:12,430 because the Spartans at this time, remember, have no fleet of any significance apart from Corinth. 257 00:28:12,700 --> 00:28:17,230 So again, you know, this is going to come later, but there's no possibilities. 258 00:28:17,440 --> 00:28:23,290 So I think the Athenians were doing all that they could, which is to weaken Sparta, 259 00:28:23,290 --> 00:28:31,509 to raise up all sorts of enemies against them, strengthen the existing enemies within the Peloponnesian. 260 00:28:31,510 --> 00:28:37,659 The ideal, of course, breaking up the Peloponnesian League as a whole would have been very damaging. 261 00:28:37,660 --> 00:28:43,810 And that is, again, what happens in the 3/16 B.C. when Sparta is finished finally. 262 00:28:44,140 --> 00:28:46,570 So I think the thing is, did all they could. 263 00:28:46,570 --> 00:28:56,950 The problem they had with Argos was that, as I mentioned, within Argos there are Democrats who tend to look to Athens oligarchs whose sympathies, 264 00:28:56,950 --> 00:29:02,760 whose as it were, political, ideological centres are more with Sparta than they are with that. 265 00:29:02,800 --> 00:29:06,400 If there's a choice, you know, they're not going to go with a democracy. 266 00:29:06,820 --> 00:29:13,390 So you got a change of regime in the in a couple of times in the first half of the fall terms. 267 00:29:14,780 --> 00:29:23,210 Yes. And I think after that battle of Mantinaea in 418, there is then another peace signed between Sparta and Argos, isn't there. 268 00:29:23,420 --> 00:29:27,290 Is it 50? Is that. Yes. and Sparta and Mantinaea 269 00:29:27,290 --> 00:29:34,609 Because the victory at M, as you said, is brilliantly puts it restored Sparta's reputation. 270 00:29:34,610 --> 00:29:38,989 They thought the Spartans now again were what they once were. 271 00:29:38,990 --> 00:29:46,819 And the point there is since Pylos, which had really hamstrung them and made them look stupid because they had a 272 00:29:46,820 --> 00:29:51,649 bunch of Spartans surrendering and then they were kept as prisoners in Athens. 273 00:29:51,650 --> 00:29:57,800 I mean, really bad for morale and for all the alliance support for Sparta. 274 00:29:58,100 --> 00:30:09,200 So Battle of Matinaea and a standard Hoplite, one of the relatively few traditional Hoplite encounters and the Spartans under King Aegis, 275 00:30:09,410 --> 00:30:16,819 we should say that Archedamus is by now dead and his son, I guess the second, has taken over a terrific victory. 276 00:30:16,820 --> 00:30:21,290 A trouncing of the Athenians. Only in fall when they. 277 00:30:22,810 --> 00:30:28,060 Okay. So we get to 418 and so and we get to some 278 00:30:28,060 --> 00:30:32,620 Sparta has reasserted itself and then of course we come to the Sicilian expedition 279 00:30:32,620 --> 00:30:36,370 and we could spend the whole podcast series talking about the Sicilian expedition, 280 00:30:36,370 --> 00:30:37,510 but we're not going to do that. 281 00:30:38,050 --> 00:30:45,550 I want to look at this expedition in some very targeted and focussed ways, because I'm sure the students will be familiar with it. 282 00:30:46,030 --> 00:30:54,720 So Paul will carry on with you. Very simple question Could the Athenians have conquered Sicily if they'd used a different strategy? 283 00:30:54,730 --> 00:30:59,560 So was it ever a realistic target or was this simply imperialism gone mad? 284 00:31:00,430 --> 00:31:03,639 I mentioned earlier that the Athenians had shown interest. 285 00:31:03,640 --> 00:31:07,840 We're not sure quite what in Sicily as early as the mid four twenties, 286 00:31:08,140 --> 00:31:15,700 the ostensible reason for getting involved again was to support a non-Greek people very interestingly in the 287 00:31:15,700 --> 00:31:23,080 far west of Sicily who had a grouse against people who were allied with people who were allied with Sparta. 288 00:31:23,380 --> 00:31:32,020 And so there's a sort of indirect connection with the main Peloponnesian War, which is Athens versus Sparta, but not a very direct one. 289 00:31:32,320 --> 00:31:39,549 We hear of partly from comedy, actually absurd notions of Athenians expanding their empire. 290 00:31:39,550 --> 00:31:47,050 This is, of course, very much against Pericles' strategy as described by three cities as far as North Africa. 291 00:31:47,050 --> 00:31:53,320 We're going to take on the Carthaginians, who, of course, had their stake in western Sicily already. 292 00:31:53,320 --> 00:32:00,610 So things actually do build up involving the Carthaginians, partly because the Athenians get involved in Sicily. 293 00:32:00,910 --> 00:32:10,720 But the ostensible reason is to help a particular people against another Sicilian entity, and that seems relatively modest. 294 00:32:10,900 --> 00:32:15,760 The war, as it evolves, turns out to be Athens versus 295 00:32:15,970 --> 00:32:22,680 Syracuse, being an ally of Sparta and Syracuse being the biggest city oligarch, 296 00:32:23,050 --> 00:32:31,240 governed until relatively recently before the Peloponnesian War, actually then becomes a kind of democracy. 297 00:32:31,240 --> 00:32:39,190 And so that's actually one of Thucydides' points. You got two enemies who are very similar, normally Sparta's pro oligarchy, 298 00:32:39,400 --> 00:32:45,580 and Athens is a democracy and pro-democracy, so very different types of polity fighting each other. 299 00:32:46,180 --> 00:32:52,989 And so what the Athenians seem to have got wrong, this is you can infer this from Thucydides' accounts. 300 00:32:52,990 --> 00:32:58,660 He doesn't spell it out. Why did they not go straight in against Syracuse? 301 00:32:59,110 --> 00:33:10,390 Why did they waste time seeking allies going round north Sicily, northwest Sicily, building up support and then taking on Syracuse? 302 00:33:10,660 --> 00:33:16,809 Well, if we believe this and it is one of the three commanders and of course, that's part of Athens is problem. 303 00:33:16,810 --> 00:33:22,550 They had three commanders who had different views on what the best strategy was. 304 00:33:22,870 --> 00:33:26,560 One of them, Lamica, says, go for it straight with Syracuse. 305 00:33:26,830 --> 00:33:31,650 Alcibiades says we'll get lots of allowances to go. 306 00:33:31,660 --> 00:33:37,060 And then Nicias as says often is indecisive and shilly shallies between the two. 307 00:33:37,390 --> 00:33:49,210 So the strategy was proven completely wrong of not taking on Syracuse when it would have been relatively unprepared, when Athens had a huge armada. 308 00:33:49,510 --> 00:33:58,570 And of course we must add in the complications, namely the Alcibiades had been summoned back in 41524 to face the charge of impiety. 309 00:34:00,410 --> 00:34:08,300 Well, I want to talk about Alcibiades at this point, because I think from about 419 onwards, everything's about him. 310 00:34:08,390 --> 00:34:09,880 So what I always say to my students. 311 00:34:10,370 --> 00:34:21,769 So in terms of Athenian mistakes, Maria, we have the whole situation with the recall of Alcibiades to face trial and his defection to Sparta. 312 00:34:21,770 --> 00:34:25,810 So two parts to this question. First of all, why is he recalled? 313 00:34:25,820 --> 00:34:33,740 What's going on? And secondly, how does his defection to Sparta as a consequence affect the course of the war? 314 00:34:34,940 --> 00:34:42,200 Well, as the preparation of the Sicilian expedition is ongoing in Athens, we have the outbreak of a huge scandal, 315 00:34:42,830 --> 00:34:51,200 the mutilation of those slabs, the herms, which stood at door posts at a crossroads and brought good luck. 316 00:34:51,200 --> 00:34:58,340 And Hermes was the God of of travel, after all. So these were mutilated at a night of of revelry. 317 00:34:58,850 --> 00:35:04,130 And at the same time, the accusations of the profanation of the mysteries. 318 00:35:04,460 --> 00:35:09,710 Mysteries means eleusinian mysteries. And it was a huge religious scandal. 319 00:35:09,710 --> 00:35:18,080 It caused fear to the Athenians and Alciabiades' political enemies who saw in his general lawlessness. 320 00:35:18,080 --> 00:35:22,639 As as you see this, tell us about the way he conducted himself. 321 00:35:22,640 --> 00:35:28,969 His extravagant lifestyle, his political enemies found a chance 322 00:35:28,970 --> 00:35:35,390 and opportunity to to cause trouble to him and accuse him of tyrannical ambitions. 323 00:35:36,260 --> 00:35:42,110 That was a constant fear for the Athenian democracy. So to make the long story short, 324 00:35:42,560 --> 00:35:49,790 Alcibiades insists to stand trial before the sailing out of the Sicilian expedition because he was the main advocate of it. 325 00:35:50,240 --> 00:35:55,150 Nikias didn't want to go, really. So he was the heart and soul of the expedition. 326 00:35:55,160 --> 00:35:58,930 The Athenians really relied on him and they loved him. 327 00:35:58,940 --> 00:36:06,950 There was a love affair relationship almost represented both in thucydides and comedy with Alcibiades and the Athenian demos, Athenian people. 328 00:36:07,310 --> 00:36:13,250 So he was crucial to the expedition. And we really don't know what would have happened if he had sailed out and stayed on. 329 00:36:14,060 --> 00:36:18,110 So Alcibiades insists that he stands trial, but he's not listened to. 330 00:36:18,140 --> 00:36:21,440 He lives and Then he has been recalled. 331 00:36:21,740 --> 00:36:26,360 He never makes it back to Athens because he defects to the Spartans, as we said. 332 00:36:26,950 --> 00:36:32,030 So Alcibiades' loss from the expedition was fatal. 333 00:36:32,330 --> 00:36:35,750 But it was not only that he was lost to the Athenians, 334 00:36:36,290 --> 00:36:43,340 it was a gain for the Spartans because going over to the Spartans, this enabled him to give crucial advice to them. 335 00:36:43,880 --> 00:36:54,830 Two pieces of crucial advice. At least two pieces. One is appoint a general of yours and send army of yours there to organise things. 336 00:36:55,070 --> 00:37:07,920 And second, fortify the position of Dekalaea within Attica and bring the war next close to Athens for the Athenians. 337 00:37:08,280 --> 00:37:13,290 And we see that being a huge a huge barometer of the final outcome. 338 00:37:13,470 --> 00:37:18,530 It is not only the Ionian War. I mean, we shouldn't really be calling that war, Ionian War. 339 00:37:18,540 --> 00:37:25,980 We should be calling it Ionian. As regards this part of the world, Asia minor, of course, but also the Decalion war, 340 00:37:26,280 --> 00:37:32,070 because at the end of the day, we may remember that after Aegispotomoi 341 00:37:32,460 --> 00:37:42,120 the Athenians find themselves besieged by land, King argues, was installed in Dekalia in from Piraeus by those ships. 342 00:37:43,710 --> 00:37:52,350 So it was one of those mistakes that Thucydides has in this very important chapter early on in his history, 343 00:37:52,710 --> 00:37:55,740 which looks at the final outcome of the war. 344 00:37:56,190 --> 00:38:01,230 In there he unpacks those mistakes and he says they took decisions. 345 00:38:01,410 --> 00:38:05,850 It was not so much a mistake of judgement, the Sicilian expedition, 346 00:38:06,420 --> 00:38:13,320 but it was that they didn't take the correct decisions in relation to those that sailed out. 347 00:38:14,100 --> 00:38:19,140 And one of the mistaken decisions. One such decision was the recall of Alciabiades. 348 00:38:20,100 --> 00:38:28,319 Thank you. That's very, very helpful. And yes, we get a very clear picture here, don't we, both from Paul and Maria of Athenian indecisiveness. 349 00:38:28,320 --> 00:38:33,690 They don't know what they want. So you've got the three commanders in Sicily disagreeing about strategy. 350 00:38:33,990 --> 00:38:37,080 And then back in Athens, you've got lots of politicking going on. 351 00:38:37,350 --> 00:38:40,350 And people who are opposed to Alcibiades don't seem to recall him. 352 00:38:40,350 --> 00:38:44,850 So it's not a united front in Athens and that seems to cause these mistakes. 353 00:38:45,270 --> 00:38:52,020 Well, we know from thucydides that this defeats in Sicily is in four one. 354 00:38:52,020 --> 00:38:56,880 Three is a total disaster. He describes it in very graphic terms. 355 00:38:57,270 --> 00:39:00,750 So I guess the next question, Maria, is, 356 00:39:01,290 --> 00:39:07,800 was Athens' defeat in the Peloponnesian War inevitable after that Sicilian disaster, or could they have recovered? 357 00:39:09,420 --> 00:39:14,430 Certainly not is the short answer. They could have recovered and they they did recover. 358 00:39:14,670 --> 00:39:22,230 They did pretty well. We have to think a little bit before going to the specifics and some battles that followed after 415. 359 00:39:22,830 --> 00:39:27,390 I would like us to think a little bit again. We could think in terms of national character. 360 00:39:28,110 --> 00:39:31,740 The Athenians were not the sort of people who would give up easy. 361 00:39:32,070 --> 00:39:39,210 And we get the sense immediately after this description of the very pathetic description of disaster in Sicily, 362 00:39:39,390 --> 00:39:43,500 we find them back home being organised quickly. 363 00:39:44,130 --> 00:39:47,610 Building ships. Appointing ten wise men. 364 00:39:47,610 --> 00:39:52,890 Probouloi, some overtones of some kind of oligarchy coming up. 365 00:39:53,430 --> 00:39:57,660 Not yet there, but something conservative sounding there. 366 00:39:58,320 --> 00:40:04,980 The appointing those ten men who would slow things up and put the city on a more secure footing. 367 00:40:06,420 --> 00:40:14,090 And then in terms of of the war, we have some very good victories in, you know, Cynisimia, Abydos. 368 00:40:14,100 --> 00:40:21,360 Arginusae, you say, although it's this disgrace and the loss of the generals because they didn't collect the wreckage, 369 00:40:22,050 --> 00:40:23,490 there were very important victories. 370 00:40:24,590 --> 00:40:30,410 So just to be really clear then, and I think that's a very interesting point, that the Athenian defeat wasn't inevitable. 371 00:40:30,620 --> 00:40:31,969 And what that means, of course, 372 00:40:31,970 --> 00:40:38,870 is that as we carry on with our conversation is we're looking for further mistakes as to why they then lost the war after 413.